During the past few weekends, a dozen or so budding artists have taken glue in hand to painstakingly apply bits of shattered mirrors and smashed plates to the side wall of a large building.
They've signed up for a course in mosaic-making under the tutelage of celebrated artist Isaiah Zagar — but not everyone is happy about their presence. That's because the quaint street that will bear the results of their work is Bradford Alley.
It's a small street inhabited by residents who, as previously reported in PlanPhilly (http://planphilly.com/one-little-street-some-big-questions:), can be fiercely protective.
"I'm very unhappy about the mural," says Gerrie Schmidt, who contacted PlanPhilly — and several neighborhood associations and city representatives — once the project got underway. "I can't stand it," she added. "It's trashy-looking, and it brings South Street right into Bradford Alley."
Despite Schmidt's strong words, she insists that her beef is not with Zagar, but with the owner of the wall.
"She never gave us any notice that this was under consideration or was going to happen," Schmidt says. "Shouldn't people who reside nearby have input to what's going on? It seems like something that people who are interested in quality of life issues in Philadelphia should think about."
Her question brings to mind a similar one that was recently raised by an ongoing Mural Arts Program installation at Bodine High School.
In that instance, it wasn't a handful of neighbors that were displeased, but the Philadelphia Art Commission when some members wondered whether a mural should have been allowed to sprawl over the intact school building.
Does the city have mural fatigue at this point?
Are these well-intentioned arts organizations running rampant — and have they run their course?
Gary Steuer, the city's chief cultural officer has given the matter some thought. "My sense is that the city isn't overly-muraled — in fact, in many areas, there's still a huge demand for Mural Arts projects," he says.
Then he continues: "but we should be looking for quality over quantity at this point."
Both Zagar and Mural Arts stem from the wish of their founders to uplift struggling neighborhoods by making art a community effort, observes Ellen Owens, executive director of Philadelphia's Magic Gardens, Zagar's nonprofit arm.
"That said, location still matters," she says. "If Isaiah wants to do a wall in a dark alley, everyone loves the idea. If it's close to private homes, it doesn't necessarily get the same reaction."
In cases such as Bradford Alley, where the property under question is privately-owned, it's usually left to the owner to deal with neighbors.
"Of course, it's always nice to involve the community," Owens says. "And usually when people are consulted from the beginning, things can work out."
Private party, yes but in the public realm.
Schmidt, the Alley resident, says she contacted Mural Arts to get a sense of their "best practices" when it comes to community involvement.
The organization, which traces its history back to 1984, goes out of its way to win community buy-in. And, indeed, according to executive director and founder Jane Golden, Mural Arts has "always valued an intensive process where we build a connection between the artist and the community."
So, what happened with Bodine? Golden says she was "really surprised to hear that response from the Commission — but it's a point well-taken because we try not to do our work in a silo."
Although the program has appeared before the Commission for other recent projects, such as one at Philadelphia International Airport, Golden says it has never done so for school building work. "We go before the School Reform Commission," she says. Still, with 3,000 murals under its rapidly-expanding belt, the program is ready for a change, a tightening of focus, Golden admits.
"We thought that to be good public servants, we needed to keep up with demand and do a lot of work," she says "We're not interested in creating another 3,000 murals. We need to think about preserving what we've created, and to think more carefully about the communities and places where we work, and the artists who we work with."
Golden has cited a recent Center City mural, created with the well-known street artist Kenny Scharf. as one example.
And, an argument might be made that Zagar himself fits the bill. Although some may roll their eyes at another garish mosaic, the artist is much more than an eccentric whose work should be relegated to the side streets around South Street. In fact, more than 100 walls in the city are imprinted with his quirky assemblages — including, notably, those at Old City's Clay Studio and Painted Bride — and his work is included in the permanent collections of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art, and D.C.'s Hirshhorn Museum.
"This is a world-renowned artist, and he came to us and asked if he could use our wall," says Deen Kogan, who more than 50 years ago started Society Hill Playhouse."The side of the building already has a mural from the '70s and needed substantial re-doing. Frankly, it never occurred to me that anyone would object."
And not everyone does. "I love it," says Stan Shmia, as he turned onto Bradford Alley, where he lives. "It says we've arrived — we've been Zagared."
Shmia, who says he also welcomed an out-of-scale house down the block that others fought, adds: "Philadelphia is all about the mish-mash. It's part of what it is to live here."
Contact the reporter at jgreco@planphilly.com and follow her on Twitter @joanngreco








Comments
Philadelphia's public art is something that should be cherished. We have AMAZING public art in the form of sculpture, statue and murals. However, a "student" paying $350 to stucco broken plates onto a wall, does not an artist make. Zagar's work is somewhat interesting, in a "trash as art" sort of way. But, allowing someone with little or no artist training or skill to haphazardly glue broken glass to a wall on an historic street wall is a slap in the face of not only the residents who have to view this awful display, but true artists who study for years to hone their craft. Just because it's on public display does not make it art.
Just because you, personally, don't like it doesn't mean it's not art. I would take a Zagar creation any day over the artistic horror that I walk by daily at 49th and Spruce: http://www.flickr.com/photos/7497519@N04/5235374696/. (Inexplicably, the person who took that photo disagrees with me as to the mural's merit. I guess "liking art" *is* subjective!)
P.S. Many of history's most celebrated artists used students/apprentices to physically carry out their visions, so that's not really an argument that holds any water.
Philadelphia's public art is something that should be cherished. We have AMAZING public art in the form of sculpture, statue and murals. However, a "student" paying $350 to stucco broken plates onto a wall, does not an artist make.
Zagar's work is somewhat interesting, in a "trash as art" sort of way. But, allowing someone with little or no artist training or skill to haphazardly glue broken glass to a wall is a slap in the face of not only the residents who have to view this awful display, but true artists who study for years to hone their craft.
Just because it's on public display does not make it art.
I agree, and wrote about this very subject in June:
An Alternative to Murals | Critique
"At what point do we try something else? Public art projects abound in communities all over the world, helping to reduce blight, develop neighborhoods, build business/civic/private relationships, teach art to adolescents and children, and generally enhance the public environment. And they’re not all murals. Media vary wildly from the the familiar, sculpture, to the more obscure: performance art, dance, music, illuminated works, and more. (Even the Mural Arts’ raison d’être, grafitti, is now an established public art form.)
All of this begs the question here at home: what other artistic endeavors could our city be promoting? Are there artists, designers, artisans and other inspired individuals/organizations in Philly whose worthy projects go unnoticed? What if they were as well-funded as the largest public art program in the US? How might that change the fabric of Philadelphia? If we truly want to promote and represent our city’s Arts, Culture, and Creative Economy, shouldn’t our public projects be just as diverse as our communities?"
I agree, and wrote about this very subject in June:
An Alternative to Murals | Critique
"At what point do we try something else? Public art projects abound in communities all over the world, helping to reduce blight, develop neighborhoods, build business/civic/private relationships, teach art to adolescents and children, and generally enhance the public environment. And they’re not all murals. Media vary wildly from the the familiar, sculpture, to the more obscure: performance art, dance, music, illuminated works, and more. (Even the Mural Arts’ raison d’être, grafitti, is now an established public art form.)
All of this begs the question here at home: what other artistic endeavors could our city be promoting? Are there artists, designers, artisans and other inspired individuals/organizations in Philly whose worthy projects go unnoticed? What if they were as well-funded as the largest public art program in the US? How might that change the fabric of Philadelphia? If we truly want to promote and represent our city’s Arts, Culture, and Creative Economy, shouldn’t our public projects be just as diverse as our communities?"
I agree there is mural fatigue, but would argue it is *because* of the emphasis of community buy-in. Because artists can't create their own visions but must cater to the lowest common denominator, most Mural Arts murals in neighborhoods can be (generously) described as trite, formulaic, and cliched. At least Zagar has a vision!
Also, I really don't understand why the opinions of neighbors such as Schmidt matter. My neighbors don't consult me as to what color to paint their houses or what to plant in their gardens or what sort of car to park in front of their house; a mural is really no different. Should people like her desire total control over their neighbors, there are plenty of suburban subdivisions that regulate every aspect of the appearance of a home that I'm sure would welcome them.
quality not quantity. that says it all... thanks for a provocative article!
The work at Bodine cannot possibly be compared to Bradford Alley. The latter is the final product of a course, while the mural is just one component of the transformation of Bodine's schoolyard. The Water Department worked with Mural Arts on the project (the fact that the theme of the mural is water-related is not a coincidence), and the final improvements to the project will include extensive greening of the sidewalk around the school, planters and other shade being installed. Bodine is a multi-faceted project that is about transforming schoolyard spaces, which are some of the most important and also some of the most deadening public spaces in our neighborhoods. This project deserves more recognition as a model that can be replicated across neighborhoods in this city.
You misunderstand the point of my comparison, which was about shared responses: one from neighbors, the other from a city agency, to art in public places, one a street, the other a school building. I think the Bodine project is indeed noteworthy and deserving of attention, which is why I previously covered it in PlanPhilly at http://planphilly.com/mural-mosaics-and-more-bodine-high-school.