RDA putting $66 Million in Federal funds to workPrint Page

March 26, 2010
By Thomas J.W
For PlanPhilly

March 26, 2010

 

By Thomas J. Walsh
For PlanPhilly

The Redevelopment Authority, with the city’s Office of Housing and Community Development, on Monday will show off one of its many renewed city properties with an open inspection and dedication, celebrating the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP), the first federal stimulus program in the city.

The NSP was created at the national level in 2008 and is unrelated to the failed Neighborhood Transformation Initiative started under the Street administration. Philadelphia has now been awarded two rounds of the federal NSP money – about $66 million in all – with the second coming in January via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The money is being used for the renovation of foreclosed properties in neighborhoods all over the city.

“We’re probably managing more federal stimulus money than anybody else in the city right now,” said Terry Gillen, executive director of the RDA and senior economic adviser to Mayor Nutter. “We’re going to celebrate the completion of one of these houses.”

Properties in the first NSP round – $20 million – must be under contract and under construction by this coming September. The money is being used to rehab single family homes that have been foreclosed upon, and which are now vacant. Developers receive $20,000 per house after a property is sold, and buyers must earn less than 120 percent of the area’s median income.

“This money allows us to bring in a developer, rehab the house, put some subsidy in the house if we have to, and then sell it to a qualified buyer, who is low or moderate income,” said Gillen, adding that some of the developers are community development corporations.


Innova rehab project


NSP is far from a poverty program, said Jeffrey Allegretti, president of Center City-based Innova Services, which specializes in affordable housing.

The RDA “built this program from scratch,” Allegretti said. “Nothing like this existed. They’re going into neighborhoods that Philadelphia housing programs typically they have not gone into – Mayfair, Tacony, West Oak Lane, Overbrook. These are stable neighborhoods, and that’s kind of the point of the program – that one foreclosure on a block that becomes vacant is the beginning of instability. So the name has a meaning in this case.”

Innova has closed on eight NSP properties so far, with a handful of others in various stages of the acquisition process.

“It does three things,” Gillen said. “It eliminates vacant, foreclosed houses. It creates jobs – we’re creating about 150 construction jobs. And the third thing is getting qualified home buyers into housing in the neighborhood. It’s a great, great program.”

There are about 35 homes under construction or near completion now. Before the program is over, Gillen says about 150 houses will have been reclaimed. In Boston last week, Gillen said she was told by a senior official with the National Community Stabilization Trust that Philadelphia’s NSP was among the top five programs in the coutry.

“We’re considered a high-performing city by HUD,” Gillen told PlanPhilly, in an interview on Thursday. “So now we’re being asked to sit on panels and give advice to other cities. In other places, people are having trouble getting this money out the door. It’s a very complicated program. But we’re cranking out a couple houses a week now.”

The NSP is not yet tied in with any programs aimed at “greening” homes by methods such as weatherization, many of which are also funded with stimulus money. Gillen said that’s because most of those type of projects are targeted at owner-occupied houses.

However, “these are going to be owner-occupied houses, so we’ve been talking with the Department of Energy about getting some of that energy efficiency money for the NSP program. We think we can tap into some of that.”


Also, Allegretti said that all of the heating, air conditioning and lighting in the houses that Innova renovates are certified “Energy Star,” which is the environmental version of the Good Housekeeping seal of approval. They do major air sealing and put new roofs on every property, he said.

Round 2

A second round of NSP money, totaling $44 million, was awarded in January. The RDA will continue to do single family re-habs with the money, but it will also embark on new construction for affordable housing in three neighborhoods: Mantua, Nicetown (near the Wayne Junction train station) and Point Breeze.

In this additional aspect of the NSP, the RDA is looking for ways to leverage city money for green space, additional trees and transit improvements, among other things. Already, the City Planning Commission has partnered with the RDA to update long-range plans and zoning for those neighborhoods. The city’s Office of Housing is also involved.

“It’s a very competitive program,” Gillen said. “HUD got thousands of applications, and only a couple hundred cities got money. And we got the third largest grant of any city in the country, so it was a real sign that HUD has a lot of faith in Philadelphia, and they know we can get the money out.

“It’s an opportunity for us to really make a change in the neighborhoods. One of the requirements under NSP-2 is you have to show a significant impact in the neighborhood within three years, which is not much time in the housing world.”

That means a reduction in vacancies, a reduction in crime, or preferably both. Negotiations on specific impacts and measurements are still underway with HUD.

“It’s a new way for HUD to operate – they are being much more strict about performance,” Gillen said. “Cities that can perform are going to do well in the Obama administration, and cities that can’t are really going to struggle. That’s why we’re focused on getting this money spent, and spent well.”

Stimulus money for NSPs was also awarded in January to the Camden Redevelopment Agency ($12 million) and Camden’s Housing Authority ($14.1 million). Elsewhere in Pennsylvania, the city of Reading received $5 million. The Community Builders Inc., a national nonprofit urban housing developer with an office in Pittsburgh, was awarded $11.2 million. Community Builders has several projects in Pittsburgh underway, and has worked in Philadelphia in the Spring Garden neighborhood.

At Monday’s 10 a.m. event, Philadelphia Councilwoman Maria D. Quiñones-Sánchez will join Gillen to dedicate 4034 Markland Street (near the intersection of Hunting Park and Castor avenues), one of the first foreclosed properties in Philadelphia to be rehabilitated through the NSP.

“They are a bunch of very smart people who have worked through a lot of problems,” Allegretti said of the RDA. “The program today, eight months in, is a whole lot different from the program that was launched, because of their dynamic processes of feedback and improvement.”

Contact the reporter at thomaswalsh1@gmail.com.


ON THE WEB
National Community Stabilization Trust: http://stabilizationtrust.com/
NeighborWorks America: http://www.stablecommunities.org/

Comments

While I am definitely encouraged that this money has been made available for housing & neighborhood improvements here in Philadelphia and there is no doubt it is necessary, I disagree with the statement that the Neighborhood Transformation Initiative  was a failure. It may not have achieved all of what it set out to do, it did address a huge issue in regards to blight and vacancy in the neighborhoods where it was most prevalent. The shear numbers of vacant/dangerous $ imminently dangerous buildings that were finally cleared was a major accomplishment in itself and had never been done in decades since the creation of Urban Renewal programs. It no doubt also had some flaws, but it had some successes and some failures as well. Let's set the record straight and be fair.

Mr. Walsh,

I read these articles often touting how public agencies are fixing houses and doing such a marvelous job, but wait a minute. Why add that burdensome operating expense of all the various housing agencies to our city’s operating budget when private developers can do all these things cheaper without these expensive government agencies at all? Who needs them? Why pay for them?

 

Federal, state and city tax money pay for HUD, RDA, NSP and all the other lettered housing agencies, whose salaries are all paid by taxes; so, in essence we are straining under the burden of these pancaking agencies on top of each other; then some of the developers who win development awards from these tax paid agencies, according to this article, are community development groups, whose source of money is even more tax money funneled from some other government pocket. This is such a great scam.  Remember NTI and how much tax money went down that government agency hole?

 

Tax money is supporting tax money on top of tax money to pay salaries of tax paid government people who are attempting to do…what private developers can do and have always done efficiently, according to the market, by selling these properties through real estate agents without all these taxpayer agencies paid by taxes; so we all go backward and fall down and have no idea how to reduce the city’s operating budget. Have I got it right?

 

And on top of the surcharge to all citizens of the cost of numerous agencies on top of taxpayer agencies on these projects, then add a mere 30% more cost than the fair market construction cost, because of the 30% surcharge the monopoly of the union construction contractors is given permission to overcharge everyone by our own politicians right here by our other monopoly…our one political party town. Who pays 30% more than the fair price for anything, anywhere, anytime, except here in our beloved Philadelphia? I am getting a headache.

 

What am I missing in this amazing stack of cards? It is so completely crazy, there is no excuse for it. No wonder our mayor cannot find the millions and millions of dollars right here and there and here and there all over the place to be removed from the operating budget because it is so close in front of him that it must all be a hazy blur, until the cards collapse.

 

The saddest thing is that we are all so much smarter and we can achieve so much more to benefit the whole city, if anyone in elected leadership could see clearly through all this babble and nonsense.

 

All the best,

Gardner A. Cadwalader

Philadelphia

Re: Your article in Plan Philly

 

Mr. Walsh,

I read these articles often touting how public agencies are fixing houses and doing such a marvelous job, but wait a minute. Why add that burdensome operating expense of all the various housing agencies to our city’s operating budget when private developers can do all these things cheaper without these expensive government agencies at all? Who needs them? Why pay for them?

 

Federal, state and city tax money pay for HUD, RDA and all the other lettered housing agencies whose salaries are all paid by taxes; so, in essence we are straining under the burden of these pancaking agencies on top of each other; then some of the developers who win development awards from these agencies, according to this article, are community development groups, whose source of money is even more tax money. This is such a great scam. Tax money is supporting tax money on top of tax money to pay salaries of government people who are doing…what private developers can do without all these taxpayer agencies paid by taxes; so we all go backward and fall down. Have I got it right?

 

And on top of the surcharge to all citizens of the cost of agencies on top of taxpayer agencies on these projects, then add a mere 30% more than the fair market construction cost (who pays 30% more for anything, anywhere, anytime, except here in our beloved Philadelphia) because of the 30% surcharge the monopoly of the union construction contractors charge everyone that is supported right here by our other monopoly…our one political party town. I am getting a bad headache.

 

What am I missing in this amazing stack of cards? It is so completely crazy; when will if all fall down? No wonder our mayor cannot find the millions of dollars right here and here and there and there to be removed from the operating budget because it is so close in front of him that it must all be a hazy blur, until the cards collapse.

 

All the best,

Gardner A. Cadwalader

Philadelphia

 

X
Loading