SEPTA's plan for getting us around involves more than mappingPrint Page

September 30, 2010
By Anthony Campisi
For PlanPhilly

SEPTA has been on a rebranding kick lately.

The Route 100 is now called the Norristown High Speed Line. Phillies fans will be taking the subway to AT&T Station for the playoffs. And SEPTA has eliminated the numbers that differentiated regional rail lines.

But despite some changes in service, SEPTA is still using a map similar to the version it produced after taking over regional rail from the Pennsylvania and Reading railroads in the early 1980s.

So, a few years ago, Center City graphic designer Joel Katz thought it was time to rethink that map.

While working on the recent sign project for the Center City transit concourse ― he's responsible for the green “S” leading to stations and for the underground concourse maps ― Katz took it upon himself to draw a new map for SEPTA.

The result was a design that represents a radical departure from SEPTA's current incarnation, which uses 45-degree angles to represent the different modes of transit. Instead, Katz's lines curve gently outward from Center City.

And instead of depicting the geographically correct long loop trains take around Center City — as does SEPTA's version — Katz's map sketches out a big trunk going up to places like Jenkintown in order to make it easier to read.

The point, Katz said, is to clearly show the order of stations for riders ― not to represent the actual trackage trains take. Geography, in this case, is “counter-indicated.”

Along that same vein, riders can see, at a glance, how many regional rail lines serve a given station because each rail line gets its own, distinct line on the map.

Katz updated the map at PlanPhilly's request to include the River and Atlantic City lines in New Jersey. It now also avoids reference to the now-jettisoned regional rail line numbers and colors.

Katz's map drew praise from Penn Praxis executive director Harris Steinberg, who said Katz showed him the idea several years ago. “I think it's very elegant and legible and has a wealth of information on it that really makes the system intelligible,” he said. “I think it's a good map.”

He praised the map for being more geographically consistent in representing the Delaware and Schuylkill Rivers than SEPTA's version and for drawing clear distinctions between the different modes of transit SEPTA runs. “It would be great if something like this were adopted,” Steinberg added.

Paul Levy, president and CEO of the Center City District, which spearheaded the concourse project, also praised Katz's map.
Levy, who has known Katz for years ― he also designed the CCD's logo and the pedestrian disc maps in Center City ― called this map Katz's “passion.”

He added that Katz's effort has a “playful element about it” with its curved lines. At the same time, Levy said, “your mind can grasp it pretty quickly,” even if you're an out-of-towner.

At Katz's request, Levy said he passed the map along to SEPTA back in 2007, though he never actively advocated for it and said SEPTA may have good reasons for not adopting it.

Katz, for his part, said he'd provide the map to the authority at a steep discount. That won't be happening anytime soon.

Kim Scott Heinle, SEPTA's assistant general manager for customer service, said he thought the map looked nice but didn't see a point in replacing the current version. “It's nice, but I like ours,” he said, explaining that it would be a labor- and capital-intensive project to replace SEPTA's map with another version.

Major map redesigns, he said, usually cost transit systems “millions and millions of dollars” ― something the authority doesn't have right now.

To save money, the map's recent redesign ― in which the regional rail numbers were eliminated ― was done in-house, Heinle said. “Why would we change it just to change it?” he asked, adding that riders are comfortable with the current one.

On some level, he and communications director Elizabeth Mintz, who was in charge of the latest map redesign, think designing a new system map misses the point. Since more and more people get their information from the Internet, they argued SEPTA should better focus its efforts on increasing and updating its Web presence.

Mintz said the Internet gives SEPTA the opportunity to provide more information to riders than they could find on a station map. The site already includes fare, bike and car parking information, and she's working to add things like alternate service information.

So while riders won't be seeing Katz's map plastered in their local train station, Heinle said they'll be able to see the real-time location of buses as they travel their loops. A Beta version of the BusView system, covering two routes, is running now. He said BusView should be expanded to all routes by the end of the year.

 

Contact the reporter at acampisi@planphilly.com

 

Comments

I was under the impression the current map, with the 45 degree angles was actually done by Katz as well. Am I wrong?

Yes, the map is playful and whimsical, but even on a map that is only supposed to be consistent internally -- that is, it accurately displays spatial relationships within a system but ignores the geographic context in which that system is placed -- geography should not be so "contraindicated" that lines are moved out of their relative spatial relationships.

 

Putting the Reading trunk line entirely to the east of the Broad Street Line fails to accurately portray the relationships among the three North Philadelphia stations, for instance, and might lead a user to believe that one could get off at Wayne Junction to reach a location east of the BSL.

 

This map therefore flunks the internal consistency test.

Both this map and the current SEPTA map have a major shortcoming - the trolley routes in West Philadelphia (10, 11, 13, 34 and 36) are not shown. Why are they omitted from the map while each of the suburban regional rail lines - some of which provide considerably less service for fewer people - remain? There seem to be two distinct groups of SEPTA riders - those who use the two subway lines and trolley lines within the city and close-in suburbs, and those who use regional rail between the suburbs and Center City. Perhaps there should be two separate maps focusing on each of these markets.

Design issues aside, there's actually an important factual error in the new map that is now posted in every station - it fails to show the pedestrian connection at 8th St. between the Market-Frankford Line and PATCO and the Broad-Ridge Spur.  It's kind of incedible that this got through fact-checking internally.

 

As far as the question “Why would we change it just to change it?,” umm good question, as SEPTA finishes this expensive and unnecessary map change...

Just noticed that omission and put in a call to SEPTA about it this morning. Thanks much.

Pretty awesome except for the part where it's missing Haverford on the P&W/R100/NHSL.

 

 

X
Loading